Aug 31

But there’s a catch: The Wii currently only supports SD cards with a maximum capacity of 2GB. Also, it’ll be interesting to see how Nintendo handles the inevitable DRM that will need to be enforced to prevent the swapping and trading of games. Also, will Nintendo expand the amount of channels available on the Wii dashboard? Or will we see an “SD Channel?” What do you think?

(Via Joystiq)

Last month we reported that the
Wii was about to get a storage solution and that it wasn’t going to be a hard drive. Nintendo has finally released information on what this solution actually is, and the good news is that you won’t need to buy any additional hardware–except for maybe an SD card.

At the fall press conference in Japan, the company announced that in the spring of 2009, Wii owners will have the ability to download, store, and play games directly off an SD card via the console’s SD slot. While data can currently be stored on an SD card, you cannot access this content in-game.

Aug 30

Read the rest of our review.

(Credit:
Sarah Tew/CNET)

Where Blu-ray meets wood grain: the Vaio NW160J

Sony Vaio NW160J

This model, the NW160J, comes in at $929. There are even more affordable NW Vaios with Blu-ray drives inside, but the NW160J also comes with above-average, gaming-capable ATI graphics along with its midrange Core 2 Duo processor, making it more expensive than slightly less graphically robust competitors. However, if you’re looking for a well-designed Vaio with Blu-ray, a very good screen, and an excellent-feeling keyboard and touch pad–without moving up to a massive 17-inch desktop replacement–you’ve come to the right place.

Does Blu-ray matter to you, or is it superfluous to your laptop-purchasing considerations? Let us know below.

Is Blu-ray the future of laptops? If Sony had its way, that would certainly be the case. And if all Blu-ray-playing laptops were as well-executed as Sony’s Vaio NW160J, that wouldn’t be the most daunting consideration. Sony has been packaging its Vaio laptops as design-centric, relatively expensive multimedia machines with a Blu-ray-playing focus for a while now, so it shouldn’t be a surprise that the company’s new line of slightly higher than midrange laptops, the NW series, culminates with a 15.4-inch Blu-ray version.

Aug 30

* Send 50 million e-mails (at 0.05KB/e-mail)

* Download 62,500 songs (at 4MB/song)

* Download 125 standard-definition movies (at 2GB/movie)

* Upload 25,000 high-resolution digital photos (at 10MB/photo)

What do you think of the new 250GB/month Comcast cap?

( polls)

Apple, too, is just at the beginning stages of MobileMe, a service that offers sync and file backup to multiple devices. Additionally, the rumored all-you-can-eat iTunes could drastically change how much downloading users are doing on a monthly basis.

Comcast notes that the median usage for most residential customers falls somewhere between 2GB and 3GB, a number that is regularly broken within a matter of hours and sometimes minutes by customers taking advantage of streaming HD video and online backup services. The company breaks down basic usage numbers similar to what’s seen on the marketing materials on a consumer hard drive:

Surprisingly the company is not providing any tools to help users monitor their current usage. An FAQ on Comcast’s support site simply suggests that customers do a “Web search” for bandwidth metering software that will track this amount for them. Going forward there may be plans to set up alerts over certain thresholds, or bundle some official tool as part of the company’s starter software.

A far greater problem may be the slighting of cloud storage services that offer file transfer and backup. Services like Carbonite and Mozy let you back up and transfer the entirety of your computer’s storage several times per month, which on many standard consumer machines can be in the hundreds of gigabytes.

So what do you think about this new limit? Let us know in the comments and the poll below.

Starting October 1 customers of Comcast’s residential data services will have an invisible barrier on their monthly data usage. Under the new guidelines of Comcast’s Acceptable Use Policy announced Thursday, that cap will be set at 250 gigabytes per month, per account.

Users who go over the limit will get a courtesy call from Comcast’s customer service for the first instance. However, under the new policy a second-time offense means the service is immediately suspended for an entire calendar year.

Aug 26

There’s nothing worse than trying to print a two-page article from the Web and have it print out in a half-inch column across 37 sheets of paper. It happens all the time, and if the site you’re on doesn’t have a special printer friendly option, your only other method was to use special software, or attempt to save the page as a PDF then print it out later.

(Credit:
CNET Networks)

[via Lifehacker]

Related: Extra page killer Green Print

To do this you just plug in the page’s URL. You then have the options of simply clicking the parts of the page you want, or getting rid of things like the site’s background and images. There are also some handy tools to change the text size, along with a font changer in case you’re printing something off a page that insists on using undersized, illegible fonts.

When you run a URL through PrintWhatYouLike it's simply a matter of picking what you actually want to print from the page. (click to enlarge)

A service called PrintWhatYouLike takes all the work out of this, and does you one better by letting you select only the parts of the page you want to print, leaving things like large Flash ads, site menus, and other clutter off of your precious bathroom reading.

The service is completely free and worth bookmarking. Power users will want to make use of the bookmarklet, which lets you print any page you’re looking at without having to jump back and forth. Just one click and it brings up the special PrintWhatYouLIke interface.

Aug 26

eMachines eMD620-5777: funny name, seriously low price.

The eMD620-5777 will be available at Best Buy starting November 1.

It’s Halloween time, and I think I’ve seen a ghost: with the new eMD620-5777, Acer has resurrected the eMachines brand in the laptop space.

At $429, the eMD620-5777 costs less than many of the best-equipped Netbooks, and its 14.1-inch wide-screen display and DVD burner make it more of a true laptop. Given that the case comes stocked with AMD’s 1.6GHz Athlon 2650e–a low-power processor designed for small-form-factor PCs–and just 1GB of RAM, we hardly expect great performance or battery life from the eMD620-5777. It’s likely to be used for the same basic computing tasks as Netbooks (surfing the Web, typing documents), plus watching movies.

Of course, eMachines never completely went away–of late, the brand has been on desktops and monitors–but it’s been some time since I’ve even seen an eMachines laptop, never mind received a press release about one. But the popularity of low-cost Netbooks, coupled with tough economic times, must have convinced the company that there was still market demand for cheap laptops.

Additional specs: integrated ATI Radeon x1200 graphics, 802.11b/g Wi-Fi, a 160GB hard drive, three USB 2.0 ports, headphone/microphone jacks, stereo speakers, and
Windows Vista Home Basic.

(Credit:
eMachines)

Aug 24

Now add that account to your mail client. In Outlook 2007 and 2003, click Tools > Account Settings > New, choose “Microsoft Exchange, POP3, IMAP, or HTTP,” and click Next. Add your account information on the next screen and click Next. Outlook will connect to the server automatically and send a test message.

Once the account is in place, return to the Account Settings dialog box, select the account, and click the Change Folder button at the bottom of the window. Choose one of the existing folders, click New Folder, give the folder a name, click OK twice, and then Close.

Now I register at such sites using a separate e-mail account whose mail I filter out of my in-box. When I have to click a link in a confirmation e-mail to complete the registration, I simply look for the message in the folder I specified previously.

After the account is confirmed, you’ll be asked whether you want to make this account a custom From address. This allows you to send mail from Gmail and make it appear to originate from that account. Click Yes if this sounds like something you might want to do.

Now click the Accounts tab and choose “Add another mail account” in the “Get mail from other accounts” section. Enter the e-mail address and click Next Step. Add your password, check both “Label incoming messages” (the address is the default name for the label) and “Archive incoming messages (Skip the Inbox),” and click Add Account.

(Credit:
Gmail)

Keep mail sent to your throwaway account out of your Gmail in-box by selecting the bottom two options.

If your ISP doesn’t offer multiple e-mail accounts, sign up for a free account at a service such as Inbox.com. The company offers up to 5GB of mail storage for free and allows POP3 and SMTP access to your in-box.

Add your throwaway account to Outlook via the Add New Email Account wizard.

(Credit:
Microsoft)

Since I forward the mail sent to my ISP accounts to my Gmail in-box, I also need to keep messages sent to the throwaway account from cluttering that in-box. To add the account to Gmail, click Settings in the top-right corner, choose Forwarding and POP/IMAP, and select either Enable POP or Enable IMAP, whichever is appropriate for your account.

Start by creating a POP or IMAP account only for Web site registrations. Most ISPs offer multiple mail accounts for free. In fact, when I last checked, I had 114 free mail accounts available with my ISP. Of course, I’ve also registered five different domain names with that company, each of which comes with several mail accounts.(Maybe I could sublease the ones I’m not using.)

I always think twice or even three times before I enter my e-mail address in a Web form. Even when the site gives me the option not to have any messages sent to the address (usually by unchecking the Web form’s “Notify me” entry that’s checked by default), I can’t help but think somehow, somewhere, some snake-oil salesman is going to get hold of my address.

When you need to access a confirmation e-mail sent to your throwaway address, just choose the label in the list at the bottom left of the Gmail in-box and select the message in the resulting window.

Aug 22

Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails

“I’m spending a lot more time being the business guy than the musician and I really don’t like doing that,” Reznor said. He found the role of record executive more difficult than he had expected.

Last week, I interviewed Reznor about the online promotion of rapper Saul William’s album The Inevitable Rise and Liberation of NiggyTardust. In that interview, Reznor said he was disappointed that only 18 percent of the more than 150,000 people who downloaded the album paid for it. He and Williams offered two options: pay nothing or obtain a higher-quality audio version for $5.

“Trent thinks that (150,000 downloads) is bad?” Castle asked. “I’ll tell you bad. Bad is zero. Bad is when you spend $100,000 on marketing and tour support and you got nothing. Do you know how hard it is to go from a cold start and just get 1,000 people to listen to an album? Welcome to the music business, Trent.”

Then there is all the heavy lifting to worry about. In the telephone conversation I had with Reznor, he sounded like a guy who had been working too hard. He said he poured 18 months of his life into helping make NiggyTardust. Not only did he put up his own money, he produced the album, performed on it, oversaw all of the business tasks right down to the writing of the text on Williams’ Web site.

Does that mean, gasp, that record labels aren’t entirely evil? Well, maybe. Charges of musician exploitation and plain old bad taste aside, they certainly have a purpose. The music business is primarily about promotion, Castle said. You build name recognition through all sorts of methods: radio play, getting write-ups in music magazines, making sure a CD is prominently promoted in record stores. That takes money. Castle offered this example.

But Radiohead is one of the world’s best-known acts. The vast majority of musicians have more in common with Williams, a little-known rapper, poet, and filmmaker. Their name recognition, unlike the British superband, doesn’t count for much outside a small, loyal following.

EMI said this week that only 5 percent of its acts are profitable. This kind of prospecting requires a huge investment.

Artists who sign with a label don’t perform these chores. Executives packing MBAs and years of business expertise do. Is that a good thing? Not necessarily, but that division of labor helps.

And who does all that? “If you’re going to market someone, you’re going to have to have a publicist,” Castle said. “And you’re going to have to have tour support, somebody to care about you while you’re on the road.”

“The labels aren’t going anywhere,” Colliano said. “They’re just going to have different duties in the future.”

Reznor said he didn’t get involved with Williams to profit, but acknowledged that he spent too much making the album and said he hasn’t yet recouped his money. A record company can afford to make bad bets once in a while, said Chris Castle, a music industry insider who has worked as a vice president for both Sony Music and A&M Records. Musicians, even successful ones like Reznor, probably can’t.

What about Radiohead, you say? Many argue giving away the digital version of In Rainbows was a wild success for the British supergroup. The band hasn’t revealed the album’s Internet sales figures, but last week more than 122,000 physical copies were sold, making it the No.1 album in the U.S. Nearly everybody on the Web credited the online promotion for the booming CD sales.

We certainly learned that through Radiohead and Trent Reznor’s separate experiments with choose-your-price album promotions.

Perhaps an old-fashioned record label doing all the behind-the-scenes work isn’t the best idea for the future of music. But someone has to do it.

“What’s unsettling is that you can’t help fall into a familiarity with what works and what has worked,” said Reznor, who left Universal Music Group last year. “As much as one structure of a record deal is unfair and how little you get is bad, there was some comfort in knowing that things would work, that things like promotion and marketing would work.”

“What’s unsettling is that you can’t help fall into a familiarity with what works and what has worked. As much as one structure of a record deal is unfair and how little you get is bad, there was some comfort in knowing that things would work, that things like promotion and marketing would work.” –Trent Reznor

It’s not going out on a limb to say the current music industry business is broken and that’s why the likes of Radiohead, Reznor, and Madonna as well as consumers are revolting against it, said Jerry Del Colliano, professor of music industry at the University of Southern California. Nonetheless, he said that companies like the labels are needed to help develop talent and help the public discover that talent.

Musicians aren’t merchants.

By backing Williams with his money, name, and know-how, Reznor essentially thrust himself into the role of a music label. That is, a music label with a lot to learn. The first lesson was that you don’t always back a winner. A music company’s fortunes can often rest on its ability to discover superstars. Profits generated by a few marquee acts have always kept the companies going while all the other performers break even or lose money.

“I like Trent, I like his heart,” Castle said. “So he shouldn’t get down. He should get Saul on the road and keep him on the road touring. He shouldn’t come off until they can figure out where his core audience is.”

“Finding music at record stores has always been tough,” Castle said. “If you go into a store knowing what you want, or you’re a music aficionado, it’s easy. For the superficial buyer it’s harder. Those are the people that are going to be influenced by displays at end caps of aisles or the stuff that’s featured at listening posts. You don’t get that spot because you’re a nice person. All that stuff is paid for.”

In October, Reznor, the leader of the band Nine Inch Nails, and Radiohead attempted to promote and distribute albums online without the help of a major record label. Both offered fans the opportunity to obtain the music for free. Both saw some success.

But they also illustrated that the music business is probably better left in the hands of businessmen. Musicians are not the new labels. Artists need someone to provide financial support and business acumen. If we end up ridding the world of labels, we’ll only have to re-create them–in some other, probably more nimble form.

(Credit:
Rob Sheridan)

It’s also interesting to note that Radiohead’s manager, in an interview with The New York Times, said he doubted the choose-your-price promotion would ever work again.

Even so, Castle said Reznor and Williams shouldn’t give up the good fight.

Aug 22

In the interest of sharing, here’s what I learned:

Lineo (later renamed Embedix) was an embedded Linux vendor that rose to prominence in 1999 to 2000, and then cratered into obsolescence in 2002. I joined in 2000, the day that the acquisition of six (yes, six) different companies was announced. My first day of work was the approximately 400-person company get-together designed to build a team out of a mass of new bodies. Up until that day the total employee base was approximately 40 people.

You must own something. Lineo’s business model was to provide developer tools to facilitate the development of software stacks for mobile/embedded devices. The tools business is a very difficult business and so the company sought to expand on this to create software stacks to power things like mobile phones and PDAs. The Sharp Zaurus was an example of the company’s success with this model, but also its failure.

Lineo didn’t own the stack that it sold to Sharp. It was an aggregator of other’s IP/open source (Trolltech’s Qtopia, for example). Our model was to sell the stack on a royalty basis for something like $5 per unit, of which we’d take $1 or so. However, because we didn’t actually own anything we were always in a dependent position to those who comprised the stack. Trolltech or Esmertec, for example, both had more control of the stack than we did because they owned IP within that stack. We had our distribution of Linux but it wasn’t a solid differentiator, not with MontaVista and others creating essentially the same thing.

In open source it doesn’t matter if you license your IP freely. This, to my mind, is a positive thing. But you must own something. You must have control of something that you sell in order to convince customers to pay. Red Hat is responsible for 14 percent or more of the Linux kernel, which gives it soft control of the Linux kernel, but it’s real value differentiator is in its Red Hat Network and other ancillary services.
A business that appeals only to developers is likely a good project, but probably not a good business. Lineo, as I noted above, made developer tools. In the open-source world developers are a gateway to those with money, but they ultimately don’t control much money themselves. They are a hugely important constituency to woo, but they are not the group to which you want to sell products. Why? Because they can probably build your product better than you can, and so will have a disincentive to pay for it. They are your influencers. They’re not the ones to put your children through college.
Grow slowly, profit quickly. I mentioned that Lineo went from 40 employees to more than 400 in one day. The company spent the next two years trying to recover from that too-rapid growth. There were many compelling reasons for this growth–the primary one being, I believe, the bankers belief that without revenue the best way for Lineo to justify a strong IPO was with headcount (which seems ludicrous in the extreme in retrospect but those were ludicrous days). But they all led to an over-investment in sales and marketing on the back of a product that couldn’t support them.

Open-source companies are first and foremost engineering companies. If the product stinks, the community will stink, the company will stink, the investors will stink, and so on. An open-source company must religiously focus on product excellence. Marketing and sales are important, but they come later and extend naturally from the excellence of the product. In a proprietary company, good marketing can make up for weak products (Witness some of Microsoft’s success). In an open-source company, marketing that is better than the product deserves leads to corporate suicide. Eventually, customers look at the code and realize they were fed rubbish.

There are more lessons to be learned from Lineo (like how not to manage outsourced professional services resources, how to manage distributed development, etc.), but these three are enough. If today’s open-source companies would pay heed to just these three things, we’d be a much stronger force in the market than we already are.

I learned a tremendous amount about business and open source and the intersection of the two during my two years with Lineo. These lessons heavily influence how I see open-source opportunities today.

commentary

Aug 22

Equally importantly, letting people evaluate the full product before buying also ensures that they are well-qualified leads and that the sales cycle is much shorter. I should know–my own company routinely sells six-figure deals in under 90 days, start to finish, completely over the phone/e-mail. You can’t do that with a proprietary product.

But it needs to be said that MySQL’s way forward is not, as Gould suggests, to add proprietary bits to its software. MySQL has not done this. Instead it has added proprietary services to the periphery of its product line (like Workbench) which add value to the core software without inhibiting free and open-source use of the core software. It is critical for MySQL’s success that it not lock off its core. Doing so would trample on its primary lead generation tool.

But the fact that MySQL didn’t distinguish an Enterprise product from its Community product for so many years means that MySQL will need to continuously discover new ways to differentiate the two. This need not be with proprietary software, but will almost certainly involve “proprietary” services. Like the JBoss Operational Network or Red Hat Network, such services allow MySQL to distribute its core product freely (i.e., open source and free of cost) while providing add-on value for which customers will pay. This calls to mind Gould’s next point:

Only time will tell. But in my humble opinion, MySQL’s open source business model will make Sun’s road to payback a lot steeper than if it had bought a software company with conventional revenues and profits.

This is a moment-in-time problem but not a long-term problem, in my view. MySQL has the benefit (and problem) of having relied on a support and dual-license model for too long. The dual-license model has worked–roughly 60 percent of its revenue has come from those that want a proprietary license to the MySQL code (which gives them the benefits of open source without the requirement of contributing back modifications).

Some will think my distinction between proprietary services and proprietary software is sophistic and ultimately impotent. It’s not. Customers don’t want to be locked in on their database choice, their content management system choice, etc. When a vendor locks up this core product, they lock in the customer.

This is emphatically wrong. Gould neglects the tremendous value that giving away Community provides to MySQL. From where does he think the company’s sales leads come? From Community, of course. MySQL only recently in the last year started to distinguish between the two versions. Over time, its ability to convince customers to pay for Enterprise will improve. Adding Sun to the mix will accelerate this.

First off:

MySQL attempts a Red Hat Fedora/RHEL model, but it actually has this backwards as its Enterprise version is on a faster release cycle/development path than its Community product.

Jeff Gould has written an excellent piece on the big question arising from Sun’s acquisition of MySQL: how will Sun make enough money on the deal to justify the $1 billion valuation? Gould’s analysis is generally solid, but he misses a few key points.

Reading Gould’s informed but ultimately misguided commentary on MySQL makes me very glad that it didn’t decide to sell to another buyer. It tells me that MySQL’s management is firmly committed to open source, not merely cash. Like Google, MySQL demonstrates that it’s possible to be financially responsible and socially responsible. The way forward is with open source, not proprietary lock-in. MySQL and Sun recognize this.

Ah, the good old days! Just one problem: those days are gone. Pining for an acquisition of the old way of selling and distributing software is like pining for Mayberry: you can want it, but those days are never coming back. VCs aren’t investing in proprietary Mayberry anymore. Except from the consolidators of 20th-century software (Oracle, IBM, SAP, Microsoft), customers aren’t buying into the false Mayberry that left them destitute of innovation and options.

If, however, services around the core are made proprietary (services like support, like networks that administer patch updates which can also be implemented by a more manual process, etc.), this is a way to ensure dollars more easily flow in but doesn’t prevent customers from using the core product for free. And it certainly doesn’t prevent them from switching to a competing product. They lose the peripheral value, but that’s a small price to pay. Importantly for MySQL with its Workbench product, in particular, MySQL is not locking anyone out of its products. The same things that a developer would use Workbench to achieve can be done directly without Workbench. It’s a time-saver but not even one that a good developer necessarily wants. Peripheral value, not core.

“It appears though that the additional features of the Enterprise version are not enough to compensate for the revenue-destroying effects of the free Community alternative.”

Open source is the way forward. But that doesn’t make it an easy road, as Gould suggests. Here’s where his analysis becomes relevant.

commentary

Aug 21

A trio of German entrepreneurs-turned-investors may have invested in Facebook, TechCrunch wrote Tuesday.

The European Founders Fund, consisting of thirtysomething brothers Alexander, Marc and Oliver Samwer, has reportedly put out a “very brief press release” explaining that they have invested in the Palo Alto, Calif.-based social-networking site. An exact amount was not disclosed.

The investment firm was not immediately available for comment.

It’s no secret that Facebook has been hunting for new investors ever since it was pegged with a whopping $15 billion valuation following Microsoft’s famous purchase of a $240 million stake. Some of the rumors pertaining to potential investors, like a shadowy bit of gossip involving unnamed hedge funds, have turned out to be unsubstantiated.

According to the European Founders Fund’s Web site, the brothers have already invested in a number of social-media ventures: business social network LinkedIn, the Second Life-based Anshe Chung Studios, and the German social network StudiVZ, which was acquired last year. Prior to becoming investors, the Samwers founded Alando (purchased by eBay) and Jamba (purchased by VeriSign).

The European Founders Fund does not appear to be affiliated with longtime Facebook investor The Founders Fund, spearheaded by PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel.

« Previous Entries